Hi, I have just joined tribe.net and I have found that your particular tribe is interested in precognition and deja vu as phenomenon. Let me introduce myself. My name is Anthony Peake and I am the author of a book with the rather clumsy(and ultimately misleading) title of 'Is There Life After Death? - The Extraordinary Science Of What Happens When We Die. Unfortunately I lost the battle with my publisher because I wanted to call it the far more accurate 'Cheating The Ferrymna'. However this does mean I can use this title for my third book. So why should this be of interest to this tribe? Well the theory behind the book seems to offer a scientifically valid answer to the riddle of precognition and deja vu. I know that sounds like a vain and grand statement but it is nevertheless true. Indeed two weekends ago I was invited to lecture in Switzerland (I live in the UK) and quite a few academics came to hear me speak. One was a certain Dr. Arthur Funkhouser. Now if you are interested in the Deja phenomenon then Art's name will be known to you. Art had travelled from Bern to Geneva to meet me and talk over my theory. He finds it fascinating and totally plausible. Indeed we are planning to work together on the subject.
Obviously I cannot explain the 'ferryman thesis' in a short blog. May I suggest that anybody who is interested please check out my website at www.anthonypeake.com. There you will find a brief introduction to the theory and a downloadable pdf of a paper I wrote for The International Association of Near-Death Studies. Please read these and let me know what you think. The book is available world-wide and in six months has sold over 13,000 copies. If you can get hold of a copy and let me know what you think. Obviously I am keen to open up a debate here but I can also be contacted personally on cheattheferryman@aol.com.
Look forward to your thoughts and comments. - Anthony (known as Tony) Peake.
Obviously I cannot explain the 'ferryman thesis' in a short blog. May I suggest that anybody who is interested please check out my website at www.anthonypeake.com. There you will find a brief introduction to the theory and a downloadable pdf of a paper I wrote for The International Association of Near-Death Studies. Please read these and let me know what you think. The book is available world-wide and in six months has sold over 13,000 copies. If you can get hold of a copy and let me know what you think. Obviously I am keen to open up a debate here but I can also be contacted personally on cheattheferryman@aol.com.
Look forward to your thoughts and comments. - Anthony (known as Tony) Peake.
posted by:
|
United Kingdom
|
-
My mothers philosophy
Wed, February 7, 2007 - 8:16 PMI've not fully read your page, but here's some food for thought from my mother about after death:
When we die our souls and experiences go into like a big cooking pot in the sky of all other souls and experiences. Like a big soup of various ingredients. When someone is born a scoop is taken out from that pot and put into that child.
If her concept are true it does explain a lot of various religious main beliefs:
• reincarnation - in a manner of speaking, but not one for one as a scoop is unlikely to be of a specific individual before they went back into the soup.
• judgment and forgiveness - as all your experiences go to the soup, everything you did is fully made aware so you are sort of judged, yet it just becomes part of the soup, and so you are forgiven.
• meeting mom, etc, when you die - well... you meet everyone!
• past lives, regression, but not 100% perfect memory because a scoop wouldn't be exact a previous person, but perhaps close sometimes.
• many people think they were Napoleon, Cleopatra, etc - for those who are not delusional, this is possible. Those peoples experiences are all in there, perhaps these famous people had strong souls to become what they became, thus their ingredients may proliferate to many.
• we are all part of God - Maybe God is the cooking pot?
• God creates life - He is the scoop too?
• we are all connected - so very true with this idea.
• to kill someone is to cut short their experiences, so the soup gets less put back into it from the victim than if they'd not been killed.
